Programmed Module Instruction on Learners’ Performance and Collaborative and Critical Thinking Skills in General Mathematics

Authors

  • Relan M. Jarez Department of Education; Rufino G. Palabrica Sr. National High School, Brgy. San Matias, Dingle, Iloilo, 5035, Philippines

Keywords:

programmed module instruction, critical thinking skills, collaborative skill, mathematics performance

Abstract

This quasi-experimental research design aimed at finding out the effects of a researcher- made programmed module instruction to the learners’ mathematics performance and collaborative skills and critical thinking skills in General Mathematics. The Researcher-made instruments, namely: Performance Test, Critical Thinking Skills Test, Collaborative Activity, FGD, and journal entry were the data sources. Statistical tools such as frequency, rank, mean, and standard deviation were used for descriptive analysis and t-test for independent samples, t-test for paired samples, and Pearson’s r for inferential analysis. All inferential statistics were set at .05 level of significance. Results showed that after the intervention, the learners’ mathematics performance was at a ‘Proficiency level” and critical thinking skills improved to “Moderately Strong”. There was no significant difference in the mathematics performance and critical thinking skills of learners before exposure to non-programmed module instruction and programmed module instruction. There was, however, a significant difference in the mathematics performance and critical thinking skills of learners after exposure to non-programmed module instruction and programmed module instruction. There was also significant difference in the learners’ mathematics performance, critical thinking skills, and collaborative skills before and after exposure to non-programmed module instruction and programmed module instruction. No significant correlations existed between mathematics performance and critical thinking skills, between mathematics performance and collaborative skills, and between critical thinking skills and collaborative skills. Although no relationships were noted among the three variables, the computed r was positive after the intervention in both groups; hence there was still an association. Finally, the programmed module gave enjoyment, motivation, clear and simplified approach in presenting the lesson; encouraged the learners to work independently using computer; and offered valuable instructional material for learners.

References

. DepEd Order No.8, s.2015. “Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program”. Department of Education. [1]

. “Enhancing thinking skills in the classroom”, Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 1(1). [1]

. “Assessing the Mathematics Achievement of College Freshmen using Piaget’s Logical Operations.”. [1]

. “The Factors Affecting Students Success in Mathematics: Mathematics Teachers Perspectives”, Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(2), 217-230. [1]

. “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1974. [1,2]

. “Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Toronto: Pearson”. [2]

. DepEd Order No 73 S 2012. “Guidelines on the Assessment and Rating of Learning Outcomes Under the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum.”. [4]

. “Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners”, London, UK: SAGE. [5]

. “Motivating Students in Math Using Cooperative Learning”; ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED446 999; ERIC: Washington, DC, USA. [8]

. “Collaborative Learning enhances critical thinking”, Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). [8]

. “Programmed Instructional Method of Teaching on Student interest in Mathematics”, International Research Journal of Mathematics, Engineering and IT, Volume 5, Issue 1. [8]

. “Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education”, London and New York: Routledge. 237 pages. ISBN: 978-0-415-32121-1. [9]

. “The Effect of Technology on a Student’s Motivation and Knowledge”, Learning Instruction, 101-120. [10]

. “Integration of Programmed Instruction into Mathematics and Science Teaching: Panacea to Students Dwindling Interest in Mathematics and Science”, Journal of Educational Research, Volume 1, No. 3, 1999-209. [10,11]

. “Introduction to New Technologies and How they can contribute to Language Learning and Teaching”, Module 1.1 in Davies G. (ed.), Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT), Slough, Thames Valley University [Online], 2012. Retrieved from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-1.htm. [11,12]

. “Collaborative Learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge”. Learning Instruction, 10(4). [13]

. “Determinants that Impact First Year Male Students’ Motivation to Learn at UAE Public Colleges”, USQ ePrints, 2016, https://eprints.usq.edu.au/28742/.[13]

. “Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics of Grade-7”. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 5 No.4, 21-27 November 2017 Part II P-ISSN 2350-7756 E-ISSN 2350-8442 www.apjmr.com. [14]

. “How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education”, New York. McGraw-Hill Companies. [15]

Downloads

Published

2020-12-24

How to Cite

Relan M. Jarez. (2020). Programmed Module Instruction on Learners’ Performance and Collaborative and Critical Thinking Skills in General Mathematics. International Journal of Formal Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 6(01), 7–27. Retrieved from https://ijfscfrtjournal.isrra.org/index.php/Formal_Sciences_Journal/article/view/604

Issue

Section

Articles